The Mouse and the Elephant

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Home
  • About the Mouse and the Elephant
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • The Path to Intentional Inclusiveness
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / A double bind

December 17, 2018 by eric@mouseandelephant.com Leave a Comment

A double bind

Image: gregobage/Getty Images via Harvard Business Review

Being demanding yet caring. Being authoritative yet participative. Advocating for themselves yet serving others. Maintaining distance yet being approachable. In the Harvard Business Review, Wei Zheng, Ronit Kark, and Alyson Meister identify these “four paradoxes, all stemming from the need to be both tough and nice,” that women leaders regularly confront.

“The problem,” they write, “is that these qualities are often seen as opposites. This creates a ‘catch-22’ and ‘double bind’ for women leaders.” To navigate these paradoxes, “women leaders first need to become aware of them, teasing out the different tensions rolled up into the central nice/tough double bind. Then, they can develop and customize a repertoire of strategies to manage, thereby enhancing their effectiveness and resilience.”

The authors offer sound suggestions for managing these tensions, which can prove valuable for any leader.

But it would be even easier for women to navigate these paradoxes — and spend less of their time and energy trying to thread the needle between nice and tough — if more men were aware of this double bind and their role in enforcing it, and took ownership for changing the leadership norms that anchor it in place.

All the women the authors interviewed are senior leaders —VP level or higher — yet despite the power their positions confer, they still go to tremendous lengths to walk that fine line between tough and nice, sacrificing some of their power to the entrenched gender norms that favor traditionally male leadership styles.

What would it mean to an organization if the time, brainpower, and energy these leaders spend navigating these paradoxes could be focused on solving complex problems, accelerating important projects, or mentoring the next generation of leaders — in other words, focused on what these leaders actually were hired to do?


This post originally appeared in The Mouse and the Elephant Resource. Read the full email here, and subscribe to receive future emails with diversity, equity, and inclusion resources using the form on our home page.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want a little Mouse in your inbox?

We absorb a massive amount of content on diversity and inclusion at work. In The Mouse and the Elephant Weekly, we curate the most valuable, thought-provoking, and useful resources we find, and deliver them to your inbox once a week.

If you want a different take on diversity headlines, want to discover surprising academic research on diversity at work, or are hungry for ideas to help you design a more inclusive workplace, we hope you'll sign up.

Recent Posts

  • White Shame: How to Convert Guilt Into Action
  • Is Your Company Actually Fighting Racism, or Just Talking About It?
  • Vicarious racism: You don’t have to be the target to be harmed
  • In St. Louis: Five Years Later
  • The evolving reparations conversation

Find it Here

  • Home
  • About the Mouse and the Elephant
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • The Path to Intentional Inclusiveness

© 2025 The Mouse and the Elephant · Rainmaker Platform